![]() The symbols are ok – but made for a ‘D’ size drawing, and if you print it out on ‘B’ size paper (11x17) it is almost illegible IMO. Here are my thoughts on a couple that stand out:Īutocad Electrical: I currently use this because our work has it. I have tried many software programs over the last few years. If you really want to appreciate ACADE, then try out DesignSpark Electrical. ![]() Manufacturers favor ePlan too much, but the ePlan Portal isn’t worth learning a whole new software suite while projects are stacking up. (Edit to say, a GOOD store with relevant and typical symbols to the industry) But, that is not likely to ever happen. Now, if Autodesk would introduce a store like ePlan Portal to download different symbols and footprints, then that would be YUGE. ![]() The nice thing too is that mechanical guys can help you with the commands as it is mostly the same as ACADM. It only works with/for you after you have setup your own template, library, numbering conventions. For example, drawing wires was not very apparent until I read the tutorials.ĪCADE is OK out of the box. ![]() Some things that should have been straight forward to do was more complicated than ACADE. What I gathered from the brief trial of ePlan is that it locks you into drawing in a specific way. I used ACADE and have tried ePlan as I too was wondering if the grass was greener elsewhere.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |